Middle income vs Thailand: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female over time
- Middle income
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 107.4% against 88.6% in Middle income, a difference of 18.8%.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Middle income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Thailand ahead.
Middle income ranks 27th and Thailand ranks 30th of 45 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Middle income averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle income | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 59.3% | 58.0% | 1.3% | Middle income |
| 1990s | 68.5% | 65.0% | 3.5% | Middle income |
| 2000s | 79.5% | 86.6% | 7.2% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 88.3% | 102.0% | 13.7% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female, Middle income or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 107.4% against 88.6% in Middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female between Middle income and Thailand?
- 18.8%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle income and Thailand?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2019.
- How do Middle income and Thailand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female?
- Middle income ranks 27th and Thailand ranks 30th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.