Eswatini vs Lower middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male over time
- Eswatini
- Lower middle income
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 106.4% against 82.4% in Lower middle income, a difference of 24.0%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 34th and Lower middle income ranks 33rd of 193 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Lower middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 66.6% | 60.8% | 5.7% | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 82.3% | 71.7% | 10.6% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 90.2% | 75.9% | 14.3% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 105.9% | 82.5% | 23.4% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male, Eswatini or Lower middle income?
- Eswatini, at 106.4% against 82.4% in Lower middle income as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male between Eswatini and Lower middle income?
- 24.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lower middle income?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2016.
- How do Eswatini and Lower middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male?
- Eswatini ranks 34th and Lower middle income ranks 33rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in primary and secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official primary and secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.