Belarus vs Lower middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- Belarus
- Lower middle income
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 100.1% against 66.8% in Lower middle income, a difference of 33.3%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 31st and Lower middle income ranks 33rd of 173 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, Belarus or Lower middle income?
- Belarus, at 100.1% against 66.8% in Lower middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between Belarus and Lower middle income?
- 33.3%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Lower middle income?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Lower middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- Belarus ranks 31st and Lower middle income ranks 33rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary, secondary and tertiary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of primary school age, secondary school age, and the five-year age group following on from secondary school leaving. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.