Lithuania vs Middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- Lithuania
- Middle income
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 103.3% against 75.1% in Middle income, a difference of 28.2%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.4 times Middle income's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 24th and Middle income ranks 25th of 173 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.3% | 56.5% | 25.8% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 100.3% | 61.7% | 38.6% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 102.5% | 72.3% | 30.3% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, Lithuania or Middle income?
- Lithuania, at 103.3% against 75.1% in Middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between Lithuania and Middle income?
- 28.2%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Middle income?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- Lithuania ranks 24th and Middle income ranks 25th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary, secondary and tertiary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of primary school age, secondary school age, and the five-year age group following on from secondary school leaving. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.