Botswana vs Kuwait: Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, gender parity index
Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, gender parity index over time
- Botswana
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 1.17 GPI against 1.15 GPI in Botswana, a difference of 0.02 GPI.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Kuwait ahead.
Botswana ranks 30th and Kuwait ranks 28th of 182 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.961 GPI | 1.18 GPI | 0.222 GPI | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 1.02 GPI | 1.09 GPI | 0.073 GPI | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, gender parity index, Botswana or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 1.17 GPI against 1.15 GPI in Botswana as of 2012.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, gender parity index between Botswana and Kuwait?
- 0.02 GPI, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kuwait?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2008.
- How do Botswana and Kuwait rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, gender parity index?
- Botswana ranks 30th and Kuwait ranks 28th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, gender parity index (GPI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ratio of female gross enrolment ratio for upper secondary to the male gross enrolment ratio for upper secondary. It is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. A GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females.