China vs UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean: Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7)

China
1.25 GPIA
in 2024
UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
1.25 GPIA
in 2022
China rank
70th
UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean rank
72nd

Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) over time

  • China
  • UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
00.511.5200020122024

How they compare

UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean currently reports 1.25 GPIA against 1.25 GPIA in China, a difference of 0 GPIA.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2013 it was UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean ahead.

China ranks 70th and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean ranks 72nd of 108 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean Difference Ahead
2010s 1.2 GPIA 1.23 GPIA 0.0331 GPIA UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean
2020s 1.3 GPIA 1.24 GPIA 0.0564 GPIA China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (isced 6 and 7), China or UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean?
UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean, at 1.25 GPIA against 1.25 GPIA in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (isced 6 and 7) between China and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean?
0 GPIA, with UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean?
10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2022.
How do China and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean rank globally for gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (isced 6 and 7)?
China ranks 70th and UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean ranks 72nd of 108 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean: Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7). Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-graduation-ratio-from-first-degree-programmes-isced-6-and-7-in-tertiary-education-8/china/unicef-latin-america-and-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-graduation-ratio-from-first-degree-programmes-isced-6-and-7-in-tertiary-education-8/china/unicef-latin-america-and-caribbean/">China vs UNICEF: Latin America and Caribbean: Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
298 places, 5,283 data points, 1997–2024
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release