ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104)
0.9982 GPIA
in 2024
Hong Kong, China
1 GPIA
in 2024
ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) rank
128th
Hong Kong, China rank
126th

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104)
  • Hong Kong, China
00.250.50.751198320032024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1 GPIA against 0.9982 GPIA in ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104), a difference of 0.0018 GPIA.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) ranks 128th and Hong Kong, China ranks 126th of 219 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 0.9978 GPIA 1.01 GPIA 0.0099 GPIA Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.9849 GPIA 0.9786 GPIA 0.0062 GPIA ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104)
2020s 1 GPIA 1 GPIA 0.0006 GPIA Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 1 GPIA against 0.9982 GPIA in ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) and Hong Kong, China?
0.0018 GPIA, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) and Hong Kong, China?
19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) ranks 128th and Hong Kong, China ranks 126th of 219 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-adjusted-gender-2/eca-southern-africa-unsdcode-98104/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-adjusted-gender-2/eca-southern-africa-unsdcode-98104/hong-kong-sar-china/">ECA: Southern Africa (unsdcode:98104) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
411 places, 11,756 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release