Mongolia vs OECD members: Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female
Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female over time
- Mongolia
- OECD members
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 70.4% against 54.8% in OECD members, a difference of 15.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times OECD members's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 15th and OECD members ranks 15th of 131 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 63.6% | 47.2% | 16.4% | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 69.5% | 50.1% | 19.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female, Mongolia or OECD members?
- Mongolia, at 70.4% against 54.8% in OECD members as of 2006.
- What is the difference in percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female between Mongolia and OECD members?
- 15.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and OECD members?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2006.
- How do Mongolia and OECD members rank globally for percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female?
- Mongolia ranks 15th and OECD members ranks 15th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of female teachers at the upper secondary level expressed as a percentage of the total number of teachers (male and female) at the upper secondary level in a given school year. Teachers are persons employed full time or part time in an official capacity to guide and direct the learning experience of pupils and students, irrespective of their qualifications or the delivery mechanism, i.e. face-to-face and/or at a distance. This definition excludes educational personnel who have no active teaching duties (e.g. headmasters, headmistresses or principals who do not teach) and persons who work occasionally or in a voluntary capacity in educational institutions.