Canada vs Macao: PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale

Canada
520.09
in 2018
Macao
525.12
in 2018
Canada rank
4th
Macao rank
1st

PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale over time

  • Canada
  • Macao
0200400600200020092018

How they compare

Macao currently reports 525.12 against 520.09 in Canada, a difference of 5.03.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 4th and Macao ranks 1st of 56 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Macao Difference Ahead
2000s 526.39 492.19 34.2 Canada
2010s 523.29 514.25 9.04 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: mean performance on the reading scale, Canada or Macao?
Macao, at 525.12 against 520.09 in Canada as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: mean performance on the reading scale between Canada and Macao?
5.03, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Macao?
6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
How do Canada and Macao rank globally for pisa: mean performance on the reading scale?
Canada ranks 4th and Macao ranks 1st of 56 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 354 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Average score of 15-year-old students on the PISA reading scale. The metric for the overall reading scale is based on a mean for participating OECD countries set at 500, with a standard deviation of 100. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/