Denmark vs Norway: PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale

Denmark
501.13
in 2018
Norway
499.45
in 2018
Denmark rank
16th
Norway rank
17th

PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale over time

  • Denmark
  • Norway
0200400600200020092018

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 501.13 against 499.45 in Norway, a difference of 1.68.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.

Denmark ranks 16th and Norway ranks 17th of 56 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 494.65 498.14 3.49 Norway
2010s 499.03 505.53 6.5 Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pisa: mean performance on the reading scale, Denmark or Norway?
Denmark, at 501.13 against 499.45 in Norway as of 2018.
What is the difference in pisa: mean performance on the reading scale between Denmark and Norway?
1.68, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Norway?
7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
How do Denmark and Norway rank globally for pisa: mean performance on the reading scale?
Denmark ranks 16th and Norway ranks 17th of 56 countries.
Where does this data come from?
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 354 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Average score of 15-year-old students on the PISA reading scale. The metric for the overall reading scale is based on a mean for participating OECD countries set at 500, with a standard deviation of 100. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/