South Korea vs Liechtenstein: PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale
PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale over time
- South Korea
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 515.52 against 514.05 in South Korea, a difference of 1.47.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 8th and Liechtenstein ranks 7th of 56 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 538.53 | 504.36 | 34.18 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 535.79 | 515.52 | 20.27 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher pisa: mean performance on the reading scale, South Korea or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 515.52 against 514.05 in South Korea as of 2012.
- What is the difference in pisa: mean performance on the reading scale between South Korea and Liechtenstein?
- 1.47, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Liechtenstein?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do South Korea and Liechtenstein rank globally for pisa: mean performance on the reading scale?
- South Korea ranks 8th and Liechtenstein ranks 7th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as PISA: Mean performance on the reading scale. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score of 15-year-old students on the PISA reading scale. The metric for the overall reading scale is based on a mean for participating OECD countries set at 500, with a standard deviation of 100. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/