MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia vs Tonga: Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to adapted
MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia
32.6%
in 2024
Tonga
11.3%
in 2024
MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia rank
49th
Tonga rank
52nd
Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to adapted over time
- MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia
- Tonga
How they compare
MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia currently reports 32.6% against 11.3% in Tonga, a difference of 21.3%.
That makes MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia's figure about 2.9 times Tonga's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia has been ahead every year.
MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia ranks 49th and Tonga ranks 52nd of 54 groups.
MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of lower secondary schools with access to adapted, MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia or Tonga?
- MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia, at 32.6% against 11.3% in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of lower secondary schools with access to adapted between MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia and Tonga?
- 21.3%, with MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia and Tonga?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia and Tonga rank globally for proportion of lower secondary schools with access to adapted?
- MDG: Caucasus and Central Asia ranks 49th and Tonga ranks 52nd of 54 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release