AIMS: Asia and the Pacific vs Macau, China: Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
1.1 GPIA
in 2024
Macau, China
0.9969 GPIA
in 2024
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific rank
74th
Macau, China rank
77th
Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in over time
- AIMS: Asia and the Pacific
- Macau, China
How they compare
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific currently reports 1.1 GPIA against 0.9969 GPIA in Macau, China, a difference of 0.1031 GPIA.
That makes AIMS: Asia and the Pacific's figure about 1.1 times Macau, China's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, AIMS: Asia and the Pacific has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific ranks 74th and Macau, China ranks 77th of 162 groups.
AIMS: Asia and the Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in, AIMS: Asia and the Pacific or Macau, China?
- AIMS: Asia and the Pacific, at 1.1 GPIA against 0.9969 GPIA in Macau, China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in between AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Macau, China?
- 0.1031 GPIA, with AIMS: Asia and the Pacific ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Macau, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Asia and the Pacific and Macau, China rank globally for proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in?
- AIMS: Asia and the Pacific ranks 74th and Macau, China ranks 77th of 162 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in pre-primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release