China vs UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary

China
15.3 headcount basis
in 2024
UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)
26.12 headcount basis
in 2020
China rank
30th
UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) rank
31st

Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary over time

  • China
  • UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)
0102030201420192024

How they compare

UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) currently reports 26.12 headcount basis against 15.3 headcount basis in China, a difference of 10.82 headcount basis.

That makes UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)'s figure about 1.7 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was China ahead.

China ranks 30th and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) ranks 31st of 63 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) Difference Ahead
2010s 17.15 headcount basis 16.05 headcount basis 1.1 headcount basis China
2020s 16.02 headcount basis 26.12 headcount basis 10.11 headcount basis UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary, China or UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)?
UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas), at 26.12 headcount basis against 15.3 headcount basis in China as of 2020.
What is the difference in pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary between China and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)?
10.82 headcount basis, with UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do China and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) rank globally for pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary?
China ranks 30th and UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas) ranks 31st of 63 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary (headcount basis). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-qualified-teacher-ratio-in-upper-secondary-headcount-basis-2/china/unicef-economic-community-of-central-african-states-eccas/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/pupil-qualified-teacher-ratio-in-upper-secondary-headcount-basis-2/china/unicef-economic-community-of-central-african-states-eccas/">China vs UNICEF: Economic Community of Central African States (eccas): Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary (headcount basis)
Unit
headcount basis
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
220 places, 2,175 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release