ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) vs Portugal: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps

ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
2.62 million
in 2024
Portugal
11,380
in 2023
ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) rank
95th
Portugal rank
93rd

Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps over time

  • ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
  • Portugal
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M197019972024

How they compare

ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) currently reports 2.62 million against 11,380 in Portugal, a difference of 2.61 million.

That makes ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)'s figure about 230.4 times Portugal's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) has been ahead every year.

ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) ranks 95th and Portugal ranks 93rd of 220 groups.

ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 6.63 million 220,395 6.41 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
1980s 8.00 million 222,665 7.78 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
1990s 7.91 million 149,428 7.76 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
2010s 2.67 million 22,334 2.65 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)
2020s 2.52 million 11,862 2.51 million ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps, ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) or Portugal?
ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302), at 2.62 million against 11,380 in Portugal as of 2024.
What is the difference in repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps between ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) and Portugal?
2.61 million, with ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) and Portugal?
16 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) and Portugal rank globally for repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps?
ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) ranks 95th and Portugal ranks 93rd of 220 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) vs Portugal: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/repeaters-in-primary-education-all-grades-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/eclac-latin-america-unsdcode-98302/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/repeaters-in-primary-education-all-grades-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/eclac-latin-america-unsdcode-98302/portugal/">ECLAC: Latin America (unsdcode:98302) vs Portugal: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
425 places, 17,479 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number) with 748 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.