Monaco vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps

Monaco
12
in 2024
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
246,366
in 2024
Monaco rank
182nd
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank
180th

Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps over time

  • Monaco
  • UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
0200.0k400.0k600.0k198320032024

How they compare

UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries currently reports 246,366 against 12 in Monaco, a difference of 246,354.

Across all 24 years both countries report, UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries has been ahead every year.

Monaco ranks 182nd and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 180th of 205 countries.

UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 70.33 522,511 522,441 UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2000s 0 270,897 270,897 UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2010s 16.3 142,076 142,059 UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries
2020s 15 205,028 205,013 UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps, Monaco or UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries, at 246,366 against 12 in Monaco as of 2024.
What is the difference in repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps between Monaco and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
246,354, with UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries?
24 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Monaco and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries rank globally for repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps?
Monaco ranks 182nd and UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries ranks 180th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/repeaters-in-primary-education-all-grades-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/monaco/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/repeaters-in-primary-education-all-grades-both-sexes-number-gaps-filled/monaco/unicef-europe-and-central-asia-programme-countries/">Monaco vs UNICEF: Europe and Central Asia Programme Countries: Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number), gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
425 places, 17,479 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number) with 748 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.