East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Serbia: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
37.7%
in 2019
Serbia
73.8%
in 2019
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
8th
Serbia rank
5th

Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Serbia
020406080199820082019

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 73.8% against 37.7% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 36.1%.

That makes Serbia's figure about 2.0 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 5th of 45 groups.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s 45.8% 76.2% 30.4% Serbia
2000s 38.0% 76.0% 38.0% Serbia
2010s 39.1% 75.1% 36.0% Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Serbia?
Serbia, at 73.8% against 37.7% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2019.
What is the difference in share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Serbia?
36.1%, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Serbia?
21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Serbia rank globally for share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 8th and Serbia ranks 5th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Serbia: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-all-students-in-upper-secondary-education-enrolled-in-vocational-programmes/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-all-students-in-upper-secondary-education-enrolled-in-vocational-programmes/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/serbia/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Serbia: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 3,533 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total number of students enrolled in vocational programmes at the upper secondary education level, expressed as a percentage of the total number of students enrolled in all programmes (vocational and general) at the upper secondary level. Vocational education is designed for learners to acquire the knowledge, skills and competencies specific to a particular occupation or trade or class of occupations or trades. Vocational education may have work-based components (e.g. apprenticeships). Successful completion of such programmes leads to labour-market relevant vocational qualifications acknowledged as occupationally-oriented by the relevant national authorities and/or the labour market.