High income vs Latvia: Trained teachers in upper secondary education
High income
95.4%
in 2020
Latvia
100.0%
in 2022
High income rank
2nd
Latvia rank
1st
Trained teachers in upper secondary education over time
- High income
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100.0% against 95.4% in High income, a difference of 4.6%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
High income ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 32 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 95.4% | 100.0% | 4.6% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 95.4% | 100.0% | 4.6% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trained teachers in upper secondary education, High income or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 100.0% against 95.4% in High income as of 2022.
- What is the difference in trained teachers in upper secondary education between High income and Latvia?
- 4.6%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do High income and Latvia rank globally for trained teachers in upper secondary education?
- High income ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Trained teachers in upper secondary education (% of total teachers). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trained teachers in upper secondary education are the percentage of upper secondary school teachers who have received the minimum organized teacher training (pre-service or in-service) required for teaching in a given country.