Macau, China vs Pre-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Macau, China
- Pre-demographic dividend
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 107.5% against 55.1% in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 52.4%.
That makes Macau, China's figure about 2.0 times Pre-demographic dividend's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.
Macau, China ranks 37th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Pre-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 93.8% | 31.1% | 62.7% | Macau, China |
| 2000s | 105.9% | 40.3% | 65.5% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 108.5% | 53.8% | 54.6% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Macau, China or Pre-demographic dividend?
- Macau, China, at 107.5% against 55.1% in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Macau, China and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 52.4%, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
- How do Macau, China and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Macau, China ranks 37th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 40th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.