Albania vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Persistence to grade 5, female
Albania
87.7%
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
87.2%
in 2019
Albania rank
95th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
97th
Persistence to grade 5, female over time
- Albania
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Albania currently reports 87.7% against 87.2% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 95th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 97th of 149 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.1% | 87.9% | 6.2% | Albania |
| 2010s | 92.2% | 86.7% | 5.5% | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher persistence to grade 5, female, Albania or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Albania, at 87.7% against 87.2% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in persistence to grade 5, female between Albania and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.5%, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Albania and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for persistence to grade 5, female?
- Albania ranks 95th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 97th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Data API, UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), published as Persistence to grade 5, female (% of cohort). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Persistence to grade 5 (percentage of cohort reaching grade 5) is the share of children enrolled in the first grade of primary school who eventually reach grade 5. The estimate is based on the reconstructed cohort method.