Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
57.7%
in 2016
Lao People's Democratic Republic
98.1%
in 2019
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
19th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
21st

Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
020406080100200020092019

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 98.1% against 57.7% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 40.4%.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 19th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 21st of 19 groups.

Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 54.7% 99.5% 44.9% Lao People's Democratic Republic
2010s 60.2% 98.8% 38.6% Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 98.1% against 57.7% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2019.
What is the difference in proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
40.4%, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 19th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 21st of 19 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-teachers-with-the-minimum-required-qualifications-in-lower-secondary-2/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-teachers-with-the-minimum-required-qualifications-in-lower-secondary-2/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lao-pdr/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
73 places, 689 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Number of female teachers who have received the minimum organized teacher training (pre-service or in-service) required for teaching at the lower secondary level in the given country, expressed as a percentage of the total number of female teachers at the lower secondary level.