Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Liechtenstein: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
23.0%
in 2019
Liechtenstein
66.8%
in 2018
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
18th
Liechtenstein rank
15th

Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Liechtenstein
20406080199720082019

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 66.8% against 23.0% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 43.8%.

That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 2.9 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 18th and Liechtenstein ranks 15th of 45 groups.

Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
2000s 30.6% 76.9% 46.3% Liechtenstein
2010s 24.6% 71.1% 46.5% Liechtenstein

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Liechtenstein?
Liechtenstein, at 66.8% against 23.0% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2018.
What is the difference in share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Liechtenstein?
43.8%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Liechtenstein?
15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Liechtenstein rank globally for share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 18th and Liechtenstein ranks 15th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Liechtenstein: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-all-students-in-upper-secondary-education-enrolled-in-vocational-programmes/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-all-students-in-upper-secondary-education-enrolled-in-vocational-programmes/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/liechtenstein/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Liechtenstein: Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 3,533 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total number of students enrolled in vocational programmes at the upper secondary education level, expressed as a percentage of the total number of students enrolled in all programmes (vocational and general) at the upper secondary level. Vocational education is designed for learners to acquire the knowledge, skills and competencies specific to a particular occupation or trade or class of occupations or trades. Vocational education may have work-based components (e.g. apprenticeships). Successful completion of such programmes leads to labour-market relevant vocational qualifications acknowledged as occupationally-oriented by the relevant national authorities and/or the labour market.