Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Theoretical duration of early childhood educational development
Hong Kong, China
2 years
in 2005
Latvia
2 years
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
73rd
Latvia rank
73rd
Theoretical duration of early childhood educational development over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 2 years against 2 years in Latvia, a difference of 0 years.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 73rd of 104 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2 years | 2 years | 0 years | — |
| 2000s | 2 years | 2 years | 0 years | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher theoretical duration of early childhood educational development, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 2 years against 2 years in Latvia as of 2005.
- What is the difference in theoretical duration of early childhood educational development between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 0 years, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2005.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for theoretical duration of early childhood educational development?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 73rd of 104 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Theoretical duration of early childhood educational development (years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release