Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa

MDG: Sub-saharan Africa: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) was 0.0% in 2021. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2021)
0.0%
Change on year
up 22.1%
Rank
131st
of 221 groups
All-time high
0.0%
in 2021
All-time low
0.0%
in 2011
Years of data
25
1997–2021

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa, 1997–2021

00.0030.0050.0070.011997200920211997: 0.001 %1998: 0.001 %1999: 0.001 %2000: 0.001 %2001: 0.001 %2002: 0.001 %2003: 0.001 %2004: 0.001 %2005: 0.001 %2006: 0.001 %2007: 0.001 %2008: 0.001 %2009: 0.001 %2010: 0.001 %2011: 0.001 %2012: 0.001 %2013: 0.004 %2014: 0.005 %2015: 0.006 %2016: 0.008 %2017: 0.005 %2018: 0.005 %2019: 0.006 %2020: 0.009 %2021: 0.011 %

Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa is 0.0%, measured in 2021. That is the highest value across all 25 years on record.

That represents a change of up 22.1% on the previous year and up 1,761.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa peaked at 0.0% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2011.

That places MDG: Sub-saharan Africa 131st out of 221 groups with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa, year by year

Annual values for Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa, 1997 to 2021.
Year % Change
1997 0.0%
1998 0.0% -4.7%
1999 0.0% -4.9%
2000 0.0% -10.4%
2001 0.0% -15.7%
2002 0.0% -9.8%
2003 0.0% -8.7%
2004 0.0% -2.4%
2005 0.0% +13.4%
2006 0.0% -11.8%
2007 0.0% +0.0%
2008 0.0% +3.7%
2009 0.0% -14.1%
2010 0.0% +13.7%
2011 0.0% -27.7%
2012 0.0% +88.3%
2013 0.0% +295.6%
2014 0.0% +21.3%
2015 0.0% +19.4%
2016 0.0% +21.2%
2017 0.0% -31.0%
2018 0.0% -4.3%
2019 0.0% +20.5%
2020 0.0% +46.6%
2021 0.0% +22.1%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2013 +295.6% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10
2020s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2

Countries ranked near MDG: Sub-saharan Africa

  1. 128 Colombia 0.0% compare
  2. 129 Brazil 0.0% compare
  3. 130 Peru 0.0% compare
  4. 131 Mexico 0.0% compare
  5. 132 Ecuador 0.0% compare
  6. 133 Aruba 0.0%
  7. 133 Anguilla 0.0%
  8. 133 Andorra 0.0%
  9. 133 Argentina 0.0% compare
  10. 133 Antigua and Barbuda 0.0%
  11. 133 Benin 0.0% compare
  12. 133 Burkina Faso 0.0%
  13. 133 Bahamas 0.0%
  14. 133 Bermuda 0.0%
  15. 133 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.0%
  16. 133 Barbados 0.0%
  17. 133 Brunei Darussalam 0.0%
  18. 133 Central African Republic 0.0%
  19. 133 Chile 0.0% compare
  20. 133 Comoros 0.0% compare
  21. 133 Cape Verde 0.0% compare
  22. 133 Costa Rica 0.0% compare
  23. 133 Cuba 0.0% compare
  24. 133 Curaçao 0.0%
  25. 133 Cayman Islands 0.0%
  26. 133 Djibouti 0.0%
  27. 133 Dominica 0.0%
  28. 133 Eritrea 0.0%
  29. 133 Ethiopia 0.0% compare
  30. 133 Micronesia, Federated States of 0.0%
  31. 133 Gabon 0.0%
  32. 133 Gibraltar 0.0%
  33. 133 Guinea 0.0% compare
  34. 133 Guinea-Bissau 0.0%
  35. 133 Equatorial Guinea 0.0%
  36. 133 Guyana 0.0%
  37. 133 Honduras 0.0%
  38. 133 Haiti 0.0%
  39. 133 Jamaica 0.0%
  40. 133 Kiribati 0.0%
  41. 133 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.0%
  42. 133 Liberia 0.0%
  43. 133 Libya 0.0% compare
  44. 133 Saint Lucia 0.0%
  45. 133 Liechtenstein 0.0%
  46. 133 Lesotho 0.0%
  47. 133 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
  48. 133 Macau, China 0.0% compare
  49. 133 Monaco 0.0% compare
  50. 133 Marshall Islands 0.0%
  51. 133 Mali 0.0%
  52. 133 Malta 0.0% compare
  53. 133 Montenegro 0.0% compare
  54. 133 Montserrat 0.0%
  55. 133 Malawi 0.0% compare
  56. 133 Niue 0.0%
  57. 133 Naoero 0.0%
  58. 133 Panama 0.0%
  59. 133 Palau 0.0%
  60. 133 Papua New Guinea 0.0%
  61. 133 Puerto Rico 0.0%
  62. 133 Paraguay 0.0%
  63. 133 Senegal 0.0% compare
  64. 133 Solomon Islands 0.0%
  65. 133 Sierra Leone 0.0%
  66. 133 El Salvador 0.0% compare
  67. 133 San Marino 0.0%
  68. 133 Somalia 0.0%
  69. 133 South Sudan 0.0%
  70. 133 Sao Tome and Principe 0.0%
  71. 133 Eswatini 0.0% compare
  72. 133 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0.0%
  73. 133 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0%
  74. 133 Tokelau 0.0%
  75. 133 Timor-Leste 0.0%
  76. 133 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0%
  77. 133 Tuvalu 0.0%
  78. 133 Uganda 0.0% compare
  79. 133 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
  80. 133 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 0.0%
  81. 133 Vanuatu 0.0%
  82. 133 Zambia 0.0%

See the full ranking of 430 places →

More education data for MDG: Sub-saharan Africa

All data for MDG: Sub-saharan Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
Outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa was 0.0% in 2021, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
What is the highest outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) recorded in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 2021.
What is the lowest outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) recorded in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2011.
How does MDG: Sub-saharan Africa rank for outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate)?
MDG: Sub-saharan Africa ranks 131st out of 221 groups with data for 2021.
Is outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) rising or falling in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 1,761.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this MDG: Sub-saharan Africa data come from?
The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/stat/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/mdg-sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/stat/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/mdg-sub-saharan-africa/">Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in MDG: Sub-saharan Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
430 places, 10,171 data points, 1997–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release