Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations

WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations: Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) was 0.0% in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
0.0%
Change on year
down 1.7%
Rank
91st
of 221 groups
All-time high
0.0%
in 1997
All-time low
0.0%
in 2011
Years of data
23
1997–2019

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations, 1997–2019

0.010.0150.020.0250.031997200820191997: 0.032 %1998: 0.03 %1999: 0.027 %2000: 0.025 %2001: 0.022 %2002: 0.025 %2003: 0.018 %2004: 0.025 %2005: 0.023 %2006: 0.018 %2007: 0.023 %2008: 0.024 %2009: 0.024 %2010: 0.009 %2011: 0.009 %2012: 0.011 %2013: 0.016 %2014: 0.02 %2015: 0.025 %2016: 0.029 %2017: 0.026 %2018: 0.03 %2019: 0.029 %

Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations is 0.0%, measured in 2019.

The figure is down 1.7% on the previous year and up 24.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations peaked at 0.0% in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2011.

WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ranks 91st of 221 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations, year by year

Annual values for Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations, 1997 to 2019.
Year % Change
1997 0.0%
1998 0.0% -6.7%
1999 0.0% -9.3%
2000 0.0% -9.0%
2001 0.0% -10.4%
2002 0.0% +11.7%
2003 0.0% -27.7%
2004 0.0% +37.8%
2005 0.0% -7.3%
2006 0.0% -20.2%
2007 0.0% +28.5%
2008 0.0% +1.4%
2009 0.0% -0.9%
2010 0.0% -59.7%
2011 0.0% -3.8%
2012 0.0% +15.8%
2013 0.0% +54.0%
2014 0.0% +20.9%
2015 0.0% +24.4%
2016 0.0% +19.1%
2017 0.0% -9.2%
2018 0.0% +12.3%
2019 0.0% -1.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10

Countries ranked near WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations

  1. 88 Norway 0.0% compare
  2. 89 Burundi 0.0% compare
  3. 89 Slovakia 0.0% compare
  4. 91 Nigeria 0.0% compare
  5. 92 Algeria 0.0% compare
  6. 93 North Macedonia 0.0% compare
  7. 94 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0.0% compare

See the full ranking of 430 places →

More education data for WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations

All data for WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations →

Frequently asked questions

What is outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
Outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations was 0.0% in 2019, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
What is the highest outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) recorded in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1997.
What is the lowest outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) recorded in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2011.
How does WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations rank for outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate)?
WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations ranks 91st out of 221 groups with data for 2019.
Is outbound mobility ratio to central asia, both sexes (uis estimate) rising or falling in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations?
Over the last ten years it is up 24.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations data come from?
The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/stat/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/wb-fy23-ida-countries-classified-as-fragile-situations/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/stat/outbound-mobility-ratio-to-central-asia-both-sexes-uis-estimate-percent/wb-fy23-ida-countries-classified-as-fragile-situations/">Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) in WB: Fy23 Ida Countries Classified As Fragile Situations</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
430 places, 10,171 data points, 1997–2023
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release