Latvia vs Upper middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female over time
- Latvia
- Upper middle income
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 108.0% against 86.8% in Upper middle income, a difference of 21.2%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Upper middle income's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 15th and Upper middle income ranks 14th of 173 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Upper middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.5% | 66.9% | 16.6% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 98.1% | 70.1% | 28.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 100.8% | 80.7% | 20.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female, Latvia or Upper middle income?
- Latvia, at 108.0% against 86.8% in Upper middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female between Latvia and Upper middle income?
- 21.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Upper middle income?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Upper middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female?
- Latvia ranks 15th and Upper middle income ranks 14th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in primary, secondary and tertiary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of primary school age, secondary school age, and the five-year age group following on from secondary school leaving. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.